What Madness doth prevail.

 I alwas thought the John Birch Society was a collection of wackjobs and loose cannons. OK,  I was wrong. I have seen far too many times that "conspiracy theories" usually turn out to be true. Urban Black Culture has done what I never expected to see; they have proven the JBS and the KKK to be absolutely correct. Don't take my word for it, Look up for yourself some of the speeches by the late leader of the John Birch Society and actually listen. Don't skim, don't prejudge, just listen. This guy actually firghtened me by how accurate he was in his predictions.I was always taught that the extreme right was substantiually insane and incapable of rational logic chains. 

That was both untrue and unrealistic, as BLM et al have shown. Here's another conspiracy theory you can follow: what if Soros, who we know was a Nazi sympathizer and working member of the Party, actually took the long view and is helping the black community to demonstrate their inability and unwillingness to live in civil society? Sound crazy? Maybe, but the speeches and philosophy they espoused was about the time Soros was determining his political positions and planning. He watched the Nazi machine he served for years come apart. The two political systems he was taught to hate, Communism and Captialism gained ascendency and Nazism became a hated street urchin. That had to be a tough thing to accept for him. He adopted a veneer of Socialism, with the more cynical aspects of rampant Capitalism and he learned to thrive and grow wealthy in the swamp that he hated. He learned to muck in the swamp with the best of them. 

As a Nazi, he would have learned to consider blacks as sub-human, Untermensch, as were the Jews. So he probably considered them too ignorant to figure out he really was not their friend. As a Left wing Democrat, he would partake in the Democratic policy to ignore blacks except for the year before elections.  Most Democrats do not believe blacks are clever enough to realize the Left doesn't give a crap about blacks, but they want their votes, so the game goes on. Apparently most blacks have not figured it out yet, either. For 60 or so years of voting dependably for the Left, blacks have little enough to show for it. Yet the dance continues. Blacks, like feminists, can't help shooting themselves in the foot. Feminists have gone so far as to no longer represent biological women, but favor biological (mentally ill) males over biological females. Youn can't make this stuff up, and it just keeps getting weirder. 

So, given the background and the current state of affairs, my observations are really not so improbable after all. Weird and perverse are the common denominators here, and they are here to stay. When 14% of the population commits almost 90% of all violent crime, it doesn't take a genius to figure out our virtue signaling about DEI/BLM/BUC simply makes no sense. Politicians are notoriously hypocritical, but the sheer level of Democratic mendacity is far beyond the pale. Black culture is not only dysfunctional, but also dangerous. Every black who is educated, industrious productive or responsible is dubbed "too white" by their peers. This alone is telling about the sad state of black urban culture. There is no group that even begins to approach the level of fatherless households as blacks. No other demographic preys upon itself so much as blacks. For as much as black on white crime is well over 50 times more common than thr reverse. black on black crime is even worse. 

The worse thing of all is the appallingly disingenuous way in which the left pretends there is no "black" problem, and even worse than that, that blacks are victims. The criminal who is committing a violent crime is NOT a victim, spin as you will, the person stabbing the other person is the bad guy. My personal opinion is that the leftist mantra of "toxic masculinity" is mainly to blame. Black boys and young men are almost expected to behave like feral hominids. This expection becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. 

The solution? Excision. Like any other infection, this must be removed. This generation is lost, but by removing the next from the ingrained conditioning of the black urban culture, it can be saved and maybe turned around. But to do this, the Democrats must be kept out of the proccess. They don't want black culture to be corrected. That would take too much power away from them. It's that or we really will face something very like a race war. That is the end game for Soros and theDemocrats, whose plan is to take up the reins of total power once the dust clears. It won't be pretty. 

Liberal poisons being injected into America’s lifeblood.

 

In our largest city, a Muslim radical elected to Mayor has refused to participate in ceremonies honoring Jewish Americans, condemn antisemitism or even acknowledge the brutal attacks by Hamas on innocent Israeli women and children. Furthermore, he is in opposition to businesses, financial success based on actual hard work, or equality under the law. Blacks and Muslims, he feels , are not bound by Constitutional law, nor should they be held accountable for crimes they commit. His policies have severely affected the tax base for the city and he apparently expects the federal government to bail the city out. So far, none of this has been addressed by Democrats or the main stream media, despite the importance of this to the US as a country. 

The Democrats are trying to normalize socialist extremism and subversion of the Constitution. Why? Did they not all take an oath to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic”? That oath does not have an expiration date. Apparently, the Dems think themselves too enlightened to actually keep their promises and oaths. It is unfortunate that there really is no place for a moderate or centrist in the Democratic Party. One must: A. Hate Trump, even when he is right. b.Hate Trump, because Orange man bad! C. hate yourself for being white, or if you aren't white, hate whites for being white. D. Despise the traditional family, and hate men for being toxic. E. Hate and kill unwanted babies, and pretend it is moral to kill them. F. embrace ethnic cleansing against whites, but pretend it isn't happening. G. Hate Christianity for pointing out Moral values, support Islam, because either tisn't Christianity, but NEVER examine what Islam actually teaches and practices, because liberals are all about gays and grooming kids for pederasty, while accusing the other side of being pedophiles. Remember, lying is only lying when Conservatives do it.

At least one legislator has enough sense and gumption to address a lot of the problem, get foreign nationals out of federal government. Even Mexico has that much common sense. No foreign born in Mexico, naturalized or not, can hold office, nor have unrestricted freedom to purchase land. Their national language is Spanish, and that is what everyone speaks, period, no exceptions. Foreign languages are taught in college, but everyone is expected to learn and use Spanish in public, institutions and educational settings. Also their borders to the south are highly secured, and illegally entering their country carries harsh punishment. They keep the US border open so they can dump their mentally ill, criminals and other undesirables across the border into “El Norte”. Maybe we should banish all our illegals to Canada. I’ll bet the liberals there would sing a different tune if we did that. 

Only citizens may legally vote. No illegal is, by federal law, allowed to obtain an interstate commercial license, own a weapon or vote. No illegal may legally obtain any federal or state assistance. The Dems totally ignore the law and nobody’s doing anything about it. Conservatives, especially white conservatives, are expected to toe the line, but not liberals. The two tiered law enforcement is so common nobody even expects the Left to have to obey the law. That should scare the hell out of everyone. The MSM SHOULD be all over that like white on paper. They aren’t and a lot of this is due to Soros and foreign interests (eg CCP) outright owning MSM and most Democrats. Yes, it’s a bad as that, but we are so conditioned to being ashamed of patriotism, whitenesss, obeying the law and simple truth, we can’t bring ourselves to act as we should. Thomas Jefferson was a prophet of sorts. “When the government fails to carry out its duties and to protect its citizens, it is their prerogative to take action to secure those rights by force of arms if necessary.” 

Vigilante Law was a direct result of corruption and laisse faire attitude by government and law enforcement. The courts have lost their ability to deal justly with the public. We need to act with reason and if that fails, with force. Time to weed the garden and take out the trash. IT is past time to stop the majority from taking orders from the minority, now. 

Mamdani shows his colors. Equity over equality.

 If you have a flat tire, you (assuming simple rationality) add air to the tire. That is logical, rational and it works. Equality is like that, a level playing field where everyone gets ahead by hard work and personal achievement. Equity means that, like in a caste system, one's skin color and race determine one's plae in life. Mamdani wants to make NYC the starting point for a political ideology and movement advocating for the unity of Muslims worldwide under one Islamic state, often a caliphate, or through an international organization based on Islamic principles (Sharia). It promotes solidarity, the "ummah" (Muslim community) as the primary allegiance, and often serves as a form of anti-colonial resistance to Western influence. Under this system (as under the ideal Liberal society) the approach to a flat tire is to take the air out of the other three. The entire approach to problems by the Left requires exceptional energy in it's defense. Leftist ideology is not much into the objective reality category. 

What I find interesting in the Islam-Leftist love affair is that about everything the Left promotes is anathema to Islamic ideology.It is Haram,Haram is an Arabic term meaning "forbidden" or "prohibited" in Islamic law.Muslim dominated countries stone women who try to demand self determination or leave their husbands, or try to get an abortion. Gays are stoned, thrown off buildings, or in some cases, burned alive. Sharia law is not attuned to personal freedom. The liberal Left has not dealt with reality and shows no potential for doing so. So, the Left is in denial about Islam. They simply hate the Judeo-Christian legacy that much. 

Mamdani is engaged in ethnic cleansing against Christians and Jews in NYC and wants NYC to go the way of London, England. In Muslim areas of London, women cannot walk alone, must wear Hijab (head scarves) and you cannot walk a dog. "grooming gangs" wander the neighborhood, and no non-Muslim girl is safe from rape. Islam does not consider the rape of a non-Muslim girl or woman to be a sin or against the law. However, if one reports that rape by a Muslim, you will be the one arrested for a "hate crime". You can go to prison in the UK if you post anything critical of Islam online. This is what Mamdani and the other Islamists want to do here. Replace US law with Sharia and US culture with Islamic culture.

So mix together DEI,CRT,BUC,Sharia,and anti-White ethnic cleansing and you have the Democratic platform and in the process, the death of American tradition, family and the Constitution. It is Satan's own brew of poison for traditional family values and freedom. You should really think about this before voting this year. If you want your grandchildren to worship Allah, wear hijab, spit on the US flag and watch American culture obliterated and replaced with Sharia, by all means vote Democrat.

Our System of governance should be changed

 Our System of Governance Should be Changed.

It occurred to me that if I am going to criticize what the government and various political elements in the country are doing, I should rightly have an alternative to present. That being said, I also think that there should be standards by which any system of laws should be judged 

So lets start with an overriding concern. The function of law is to serve the populace, not the converse. As it stands, the law (and the government) act in their own interest, not the best interest of the population at large. That is to say, government and the laws perpetuating its existence act to support and enable that government, not the will and interest of the population. 

It is further true that there are subsets of the population that are favored by the laws and the government which is formed by them. Since the motivation of the government is to maintain itself, not to serve the bulk of the population, it follows that that portion of the population which is most able and willing to support and maintain that government is most favored by that government. “Them what has, gets” is an aphorism that summarizes the actual functioning of the present government. It can be made more technical and detailed, but no more true in it's presentation. 

History, for those interested enough to study it, points out that this descent into pragmatic servitude to the wealthy is a failing of most all governments in history. However, history also provides an ideal that could and probably would minimize this tendency. 

“Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus was a Roman consul (460 BCE) and dictator (458 and 439 BCE), a legendary figure in the early days of the Republic. He responded to a call from the city fathers, left his plow lying in the fields, donned his senatorial toga, and led the Roman forces to victory over the invading Aequi, only to return to his small farm fifteen days later. For generations, he served as the symbol to Romans young and old of what a loyal citizen ought to aspire.

Although Cincinnatus has long been considered a heroic representation of the virtuous Roman citizen, there are some historians who doubt the story altogether, claiming it to be nothing more than a myth. Yet, while there are many who may not accept the story as genuine, they contend that it does not really matter whether or not it is true. As with any myth or legend, the story of the heroic Cincinnatus served a useful purpose by rallying the citizens of the fledgling Republic together as one, demonstrating that a loyal citizen must place the matters of the state over his own self-interest.”

There is some question whether this is historically accurate, but as an idealized principal it has merit. Government by those unwilling to govern,as contradictory as that sounds, is the ideal form of government. Government by conscription may be the closest to an ideal that can be accomplished. We trust the very most important decisions that can be made, life and death, to a jury of twelve. These are conscripted jurors. It works. 

This could well be the standard for any governmental body or group. If legislators were lay people, conscripted like jurors for a certain period of time and given clear standards and structure for writing and passing laws, the law itself would become clear, straightforward and functional. Most of the millions of dollars spent yearly to pay lawyers and judges to interpret the laws passed by other lawyers would not be needed. For example, let any bill be presented with a mandatory prologue. This prologue. would state the intent and scope of the law in clear and universally understandable language, and the details of the law, including dates of application and review would be contained in the body of the bill. No additions to the bill would be permissible, as this is one of the most easily corruptible aspects of our present congressional system. 

Those holding law licenses would be barred from making laws. The reasoning is simple; lawyers write laws for lawyers, non-lawyers write laws with the sole purpose of making a clear guidance and law. Lawyers would be allowed in the judicial segment of the government and nowhere else. The judiciary would, as they do now, review laws to ensure compliance with the original intent of the Constitution. 

Constitutional issues, such as keeping and bearing arms would not be legislated under the concept of subsidiarity, as would almost all other issues. Subsidiarity is simply the item of social justice that states that problems should be addressed at the point closest to the problem at which that problem can be addressed successfully. Issues like concealed carry of arms should be nationwide, and the sole source of guidance should be the Constitution. Common ares of interest like medical licensure, Nursing and other such licensing should be likewise national in scope. It is intrinsically unfair that any citizen receive lesser protection simply based on geography. 

Issues like education, on the other hand, are definitely best handled at the closest to local level possible. Guidance and standards of performance would be nationwide for reasons given above. The so called Common Core was and is a purely political construct never really meant to improve education, but rather to cater to a political group. Guidance for education would be based on such things as requirements of institutions of higher education admission standards and background minimum standards for successful completion of undergraduate courses. Tech school requirements likewise on the needs of business for entry level employees. Annual review of success would allow adjustment on a close -to-real time basis of the educational standards. 

No form of discrimination should be tolerated, including the most prevalent and subversive form of affirmative action. All success must be based on personal accomplishment, not adjusted for race, gender or whatever. Personal responsibility and accountability are part and parcel of liberty, as is blind equality. Men are not born equal, they are born with equal right to progress as far as their personal ability will take them. 

The sense of entitlement that has and is paralyzing our nation is directly tied to the failure of the family unit. The activist court and left wing interference in the nuts and bolts of life is not to be tolerated. No one has any right to that which they have not earned, and most especially not to that which someone else has worked for and earned. These must be guiding principles of any and all governance. 

Religious freedom is established in the Constitution and must be clearly and cleanly enforced. Sharia law and such imposition of religious law in any form is unconstitutional, as is the denial of anyone to practice their belief. The caveat is the humanistic ideal that (in religious practice specifically) “an it harm none, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. 

Biological sex determination is also part of Natural Law. All religious proscriptions aside, the nuclear family is and has been the means of survival and development of the human race. The basis of society should be legally, morally and practically the support and clear defense of the nuclear family and biological gender identity. Any governmental support, tacit or otherwise of any deviant of that natural order should be strictly disallowed. Individual decisions on lifestyle, as and in religion and its practice likewise should follow the earlier example “an it harm none, do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. No religious belief system should influence the law more than any other. That being said, the personal practice of religion, like keeping and bearing arms “ shall not be infringed'. There is nothing in this system and approach to governance. that is not doable, nor anything that can be cast upon as “racist”, “sexist” or other “ists”. It is simply a realistic and practical approach to fair and efficient governance. 

CIA whistleblowers reveal Obama conspired to illegally remove Trump from office and committed sedition

 

Obama, along with Biden and Hillary Clinton falsified intelligence reports and created a false FISA to attempt to remove Trump from office under false pretenses. A group of CIA whistleblowers (https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4090-pr-18-25) have come forward to corroborate a buried intel action that proves this claim. Tulsi Gabbard has called for an investigation of Obama and the others involved in the Russiagate hoax and is accusing Obama and others of sedition. 

While I am sure the Democrats will either try to bury this, and/or create some kind of diversion, the fact remains that the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress lied to the United States citizens and tried to undermine and remove under false pretenses, a duly elected sitting President. There is no way to get around this, no way to spin it. The fact is that the Democras, including Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi, Nadler, Swalwell, and the rest of the Obama administration committed deliberate sedition and lied to the public. 

This is grounds for criminal prosecution and if proven in court, prison time for all involved. It may also reveal the involvement of the CCP and the Russian government via the Soros organization and Swallwell’s  infamous CCP allegiances. There is absolutely no doubt that there is sufficient grounds for a special prosecutor investigation into this. I might add that it will be interesting to see if the Democrats pursue this investigation with the same intensity they went after Trump, and it will reveal whether or not they are as hypocritical and dishonest as I believe they are. 

Liberals blame Guns but won't admit that the woke culture is toxic to males.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/teen-killed-after-protecting-friends-senseless-shootout-locals-raise-alarm-over-rising-crime-bronx

A young man is dead.He dies heroically protecting his friends from a group of kids, one of whom shot him  in the back. The president of the Bronx, a dedicated female liberal, of course blamed the gun. The fact is, whether a gun, knife, machete, pipe, brass knuckles, or a length of chain, the person wielding the weapon is the problem, not the inanimate weapon. "There is too much violence among young people" she says. Never acknowledging that she and her feminist friends are the root cause of the problem. 

Liberal feminism has taken root like a fungal infection in public education and pop culture. Movies and even cartoons are not allowed to show any woman in an unfavorable light, the villian must be male (preferably white) and any heroism must be by a "strong female role model". All males must be shown as weak, inept and unnecessary, according to a discussion group at one of the Comicons recently. The mantra of "Males are toxic" that has flooded the culture and especially the media is now an accepted norm. The problem is that no one has the least care for the fallout from this misandric cultural fallacy. 

Someone once wrote about the Belgian Melanois shepherd "this is a dog that absolutely must have a job. Otherwise it's characteristic energy becomes destructive." This applies to male humans even more profoundly. In ancient cultures, young men were the protectors of the village; taught by older men and trained by mature males who fought alongside them, they kept the young, women, and the aged protected from harm. They learned fom the wisdom of the elderly and were role models for their younger siblings. Most inportantly, their intense and passionate energy went into a productive endeavour, and they got positive feedback for their protetion and altruistic lifestyle. 

A young man's energy must got somewhere. He needs to be a part of something bigger than himself. Without this outlet and direction for his life, he becomes, like a working dog without a job, a destructive force. Without guidance and brotherhood, he is a pariah, and a dangerous one at that. Feminism has dismally failed women, and indeed now ony cares for men who pretend to be women. This is simply an extension of the toxic view feminism has of men. If you can't get rid of them, metaphorically emasculate them, turn them into caricatures of women. And this is exactly what woke is all about. 

When was the last time you got through a movie without having to watch 2 women kissing, 2 men kissing, and an impossibly strong and beautiful woman saving the day (generally from a toxic male villian)? Boys have not only been abandoned, but are made to feel worthless and even evil, just for being who they are! Is there any wonder young people are more violent and volatile than ever? 

Give a young man a purpose, guidance and encouragement, he will become a force for good. Every boy should be made to be a disciplined, strong and moral protector of those less able than he to protect themselves and others. Nothing in that statement says to demean women, in fact being a gentleman and respectful of women, and women should be taught to be worthy of respect. Women and men are NOT the same. Woman was made from the rib of man; not from his head to lord over him, nor from his foot to be subservient to him, but from his side to be held by his side and protected, and to support him in times of distress. Men and women are supposed to compliment each other, and the world is a dreadful place when they do not. 

Wokeness and feminism, along with Black Urban Culture are literally killing our young men and women, destroying our culture, and causing untold harm. Neither Feminism, Wokeness nor Black Urban Culture has anything positive to offer us. They are failed and sick departures from normal human culture and only cause hurt and harm. Until we recognoize this truth and address the faults of our public education system, our media and our local governments, our kids will continue to die, as will our way of life eventually. Men are not toxic, but the culture that is misleading and undermining them is definitely toxic.                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Wealthy High School starts Socialist Club, but no TPUSA allowed.

 

There can be no doubt that our "educational" system has been and remains an indoctrination system for extreme leftist ideology and strongly anti-Constitutional brainwashing with a big dose of LGBTQ grooming mixed in. Graduates cannot read, don't grasp cursive writing, can't balance a checkbook,write a resume or name the 3 branches of government. They do, however, learn they are not whatever sex they were born, the traditional family is outdated, the Constitution is invalid, it is shameful to be white, reality is whatever you pretend it to be, and personal responsibility is not to be valued. Racial bigotry is OK, but only against whites and jews. Islamic Jihad is ok and sharia law should supplant Constitutional law.

Three decades of incompetent leftist university "education" has brought us naked men in tutus dancing and singing LGBTQ anthems to 5 year olds, teachers who are themselves illiterate and uneducated teaching our kids to be just like them. It is worse than the blind leading the blind, it is potentially the death knell of our society. We've achieved idiocracy. Our society dies, not with a bang, but a garbled word salad from the mouths of incompetent young politicians who disregard their constituents to push for globalism, Marxism and the destruction of traditional families and religions. Islam is OK, but Islam never was and has no intention of being a religion. Islam is a global domination social construct using religious trappings to establish a pan-world Caliphate that will push mankind back to the 4th Century and keep it that way. 

Socialism has destroyed countless formerly prosperous countries and turned them into third world shitholes with massive poverty and economic systems in shambles, rampant organized crime and collapsing infrastructure. Thomas Jefferson predicted this because he understood the mind of a politician. Uneducated poor people dependent on the government for food, shelter and health care will literally do what they are told. The extreme political Left does not view 1984 as a cautionary tale, but as a “How-To” book.